Assessment of the organic fruit quality of local and introduced apricot cultivars grown in Tunisia: morphological and physico-chemical attributes

Lachkar, Amel; Amari, Khawla; Ben Atia, Imed

doi:10.22077/jhpr.2021.3998.1190

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

¹ Regional Research Centre on Horticulture and Organic Agriculture (CRRHAB), IRESA-University of Sousse, P.O. Box 57 Chott-Mariem 4042, Sousse, Tunisia

² Laboratory of Horticulture-INRAT, University of Carthage, Hedi Karray Street, 2049 Ariana, Tunis, Tunisia

³ Technical Center of Organic Agriculture, P.O. Box 54 Chott-Mariem 4042, Sousse, Tunisia

https://doi.org/10.22077/jhpr.2021.3998.1190

Abstract

Purpose Organic farming system was considered to increase fruit quality and improve food safety. Moreover, many consumers prefer organic products due to their better taste. Among the Prunus species, apricot is well grown in the world due to its good taste and multi uses. Tunisian apricot cultivars are cultivated in many areas, well adapted and characterized by varied pomological characteristics. In fact, due to the demand of the fresh market, there is growing introduction of commercial cultivars with firmness, visual appeal and flavor as principal traits demanded. Here, we aimed to assess the quality of organic apricot among local and introduced cultivars, in order to identify the cultivar(s) with better fruit quality performances. Research method: For this purpose, morphological (attractiveness, shape, surface, ground color of skin, etc.) and physico-chemical (weight, width, TSS, titrable acidity, etc.) attributes of fruit were studied according to the international descriptors of apricot and to the other investigations on fruit quality. Findings: Few differences of morphological attributes but high significant differences for most physico-chemical attributes of organic fruit were observed between local and introduced apricot cultivars. The organic cultivation system promotes the production of high fruit quality (high value of TSS: > 13°Brix, low value of acidity and big size) for the 3 local cultivars. Limitations: No limitations were founded. Originality/Value: Compared to the introduced apricot cultivars, the local ones are characterized by the performances of their fruit quality and also by their best adaptation under organic cultivation system.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Pomology

References

Akin, E. B., Karabulut, I., & Topcu, A. (2008). Some compositional properties of main Malatya apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) varieties. Food Chemistry, 107, 939-948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.08.052.

Ali, S., Mesud, T., & Abbasi, K. S. (2011). Physicochemical characteristics of apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) grown in northern areas of Pakistan. Scientia Horticulturae, 130, 386-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2011.05.040.

Asma, B. M., & Ozturk, K. (2005). Analysis of morphological,pomological and yield characteristics of some apricot germplasm in Turkey. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 52, 305-313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-003-1384-5

Asma, B. M., Kan, T., & Birhanli, O. (2007). Characterization of promising apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) genetic resources in Malatya, Turkey. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 54, 205-212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-005-3809-9.

Audergon, J. M., Souty, M., & Breuils, L. (1990, December). Amélioration génétique pour l'obtention d'abricots de qualité. In. Neuvième Colloque sur les Recherches Fruitières, Avignon, France (pp. 217-228).

Balta, F., Kaya, T., Yarilgaç, T., Kazankaya, A., Balta, M. F., & Koyuncu, M. A. (2002). Promising apricot genetic resources from the Lake Van Region. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 49, 409-413. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020682116689.

Benaziza, A., & Lebid, H. (2007). Caractérisation de quelques variétés d’abricotier (Prunus armeniaca L.) dans la région de m’chouneche wilaya de biskra. Courrier du Savoir, 8, 101-110.

Berry, P. M., Sylvester-Bradley, R., Philipps, L., Hatch, D.J., Cuttle, S.P., Rayns, F.W., & Gosling, P. (2002). Is the productivity of organic farms restricted by the supply of available nitrogen? Soil Use and Management, 18, 248-255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2002.tb00266.x

Borsani, J., Budde, C. O., Porrini, L., Lauxmann, M. A., Lombardo, V. A., Murray, R., Andreo, C. S., Drincovich, M. F., & Lara, M. V. (2009). Carbon metabolism of peach fruit after harvest: changes in enzymes involved in organic acid and sugar level modifications. Journal of Experimental Botany, 60, 1823-1837. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp055

Cantín, C. M., Gogorcena, Y., & Moreno, M. Á. (2009). Analysis of phenotypic variation of sugar profile in different peach and nectarine [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] breeding progenies. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 89, 1909-1917. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.3672

Colaric, M., Veberic, R., Stampar, F., & Hudina, M. (2005). Evaluation of peach and nectarine fruit quality and correlations between sensory and chemical attributes. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 85, 2611-2616. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2316

Crisosto, C. H., Garner, D., Crisosto, G. M., & Bowerman, E. (2004). Increasing ‘Blackamber’ Plum (Prunus salicina Lindley) consumer acceptance. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 34, 237-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2004.06.003

Demir, F., & Kalyoncu, I. H. (2003). Some nutritional, pomological and physical properties of cornelian cherry (Cornus mas L.). Journal of Food Engineering, 60, 335-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(03)00056-6

Demirtas M.N., Bolat I., Ercisli S., Ikinci A., Olmez H.A., Sahin M., Altindag M., Celik B., 2010. The effects of different pruning treatments on the growth, fruit quality and yield of ‘Haci-haliloglu’ apricot. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus, 9, 183–192.

Depypere, L., Charle, P., Vander-Mijnsbrugge, K., & Goetghebeur, P. (2007). Stony endocarp dimension and shape variation in Prunus section Prunus. Annals of Botany, 100, 1585-1597. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcm260

Dolenc-Šturm, K., Štampar, F., & Usenik, V. (1999). Evaluating of some quality parameters of apricot cultivars using HPLC method. Acta Alimentaria, 28, 297-309. https://doi.org/10.1556/aalim.28.

Durmaz, G., Çam, M., Kutlu, T. & Hişil, Y. (2010). Some physical and chemical changes during fruit development of five common apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) cultivars. Food Science and Technology Research, 16(1), 71-78. https://doi.org/10.3136/fstr.16.71

Gezer, Ï., Haciseferogullar, H., & Demir, F. (2003). Some physical properties of Hacıhaliloglu apricot pit and its kernel. Journal of Food Engineering, 56(1), 49-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(02)00147-4

Gibson, R. H., Pearce, S., Morris, R. J., Symondson, W. O. C., & Memmott, J. (2007). Plant diversity and land use underorganic and conventional agriculture: awhole-far approach. Journal of Applied Ecology, 44, 792-803. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01292.x

Guerriero, R., & Watkins, R. (Eds.). (1984). Apricot descriptors: revised descriptor list for apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.). Rome: IPGRI.

Guerriero, R., Lomi, F., & D’Onofrio, C. (2006). Influence of some agronomic and ecological factors on the constancy of expression of some descriptive characters included in the UPOV apricot descriptor list. Acta Horticulturae, 717, 51-54. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2006.717.6

Gurrieri, F., Audergon, J. M., Albagnac, G., & Reich, M. (2001). Soluble sugars and carboxylic acids in ripe apricot fruit as parameters for distinguishing different cultivars. Euphytica, 117, 183-189. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026595528044

Haejin, B., Seok, K. Y., Ji, H. J., Ik, K. Y. (2014). Assessment of organic acid and sugar composition in apricot, plumcot, plum, and peach during fruit development. Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality, 87, 24-29. https://doi.org/10.5073/JABFQ.2014.087.004

Hegedűs, A., Engel, R., Abrankó, L., Balogh, E., Blázkovics, A., Hermán, R., Halász, J., Ercisli, S., Pedryc, A, & Stefanovits-Bányai, E. (2010). Antioxidant and antiradical capacities in apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) fruits: variations from genotypes, years, and analytical methods. Journal of Food Science, 75(9), 722-730. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01826.x

Hernández, F., Pinochet, J., Moreno, M. A., Martínez, J. J., & Legua, P. (2010). Performance of Prunus rootstocks for apricot in Mediterranean conditions. Scientia Horticulturae, 124(3), 354-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.01.020

Hole, D. G., Perkins, A. J., Wilson, J. D., & Alexander, I. H. (2005). Does organic farming benefit biodiversity? Biological Conservation, 112(1), 113-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2004.07.018

Hughner, R. S., McDonagh, P., Prothero, A., Shultz, C. J. II & Stanton, J. (2007). Who are organic food consumers? A compilation and review of why people purchase organic food. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 6, 94-110. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.210

Kalyoncu, I. H., Akbulat, M., & Çoklar, H. (2009). Antioxidant capacity, total phenolics and some chemical properties of semi-matured apricot cultivars grown in Malatya, Turkey. World Applied Sciences Journal, 6(4), 519-523.

Kouřimská, L., Kubaschová, K., Sus, J., Nový, P. Dvořáková, B., & Koudela, M. (2014). Comparison of the carbohydrate content in apples and carrots grown in organic and integrated farming systems. Potravinarstvo (Scientific Journal for Food Industry), 8(1), 178-183. https://doi.org/10.5219/362.

Kovács , E., & Németh-Szerdahelyi , E. (2002). ß-Galactosidase activity and cell wall break down in apricots. Journal of Food Science, 67, 2004-2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.13652621.2002.tb09492.x

Leccese, A., Bureau, S., Reich, M., Renard C. M. G. C., Audergon J. M., Mennone, C., Bartolini, S., & Viti, R. (2010) Pomological and nutraceutical properties in apricot fruit: cultivation systems and cold storage fruit management. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, 65, 112-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11130-010-0158-4

Ledbetter, C., Peterson, S., & Jenner, J. (2006). Modification of sugar profiles in California adapted apricots (Prunus armeniaca L.) through breeding with Central Asian germplasm. Euphytica, 148, s

Lichou, J., Albagnac, G., Audergon, J.M., Broquaire, J.M., Chamet, C., & Pinet, C. (1998). Abricot : les variétés, mode d’emploi. Centre Technique Interprofessionnel des Fruits et Légumes (CTIFL), Paris, 254p.

Lo Bianco, R., Farina, V., Indelicato, S. G., Filizzola, F., & Agozzino, P. (2010). Fruit physical, chemical and aromatic attributes of early, intermediate and late apricot cultivars. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 90, 1008-1019. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.3910

Milošević, T., Milošević, N., Glišić, I., & Krška, B. (2010). Characteristics of promising apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) genetic resources in central Serbia based on blossoming period and fruit quality. Horticultural Science., 37(2), 46-55. https://doi.org/10.17221/67/2009-HORTSCI

Miloševic, T., Miloševic, N., Glišic, I., & Mladenovic, J. (2012). Fruit quality, phenolics content and antioxidant capacity of new apricot cultivars from Serbia. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus, 11(5), 3-15.

Milošević, T., Milošević, N., & Glišić, I. (2013). Dynamic of fruit growth and internal fruit quality of apricot trees grafted on rootstock or with interstem. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 15, 311-321.

Mratinić, E., Popovski, B.,Milošević, T., & Popovska, M. (2011). Evaluation of apricot fruit quality and correlations between physical and chemical attributes. Czech Journal of Food Sciences., 29, 161-170.

UPOV (2007). Apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.). Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness, uniformity and stability, TG/70/4 Rev.

Ruck, J. A. (1963). Chemical methods for analysis of fruit and vegetable products. Canada. Canadian Department of Agriculture.

Ruiz, D., Egea, J., Toamas-Barberan, F. A., & Gil, M. I. (2005). Carotenoids from new apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) varieties and their relationship with flesh and skin color. Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 53, 6368-6374.

Ruiz, D., & Egea, J. (2008a). Analysis of the variability and correlations of floral biology factors affecting fruit set in apricot in a Mediterranean climate. Scientia Horticulturae, 115(2), 154-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2007.08.016

Ruiz, D., & Egea, J. (2008b). Phenotypic diversity and relationships of fruit quality traits in apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) germplasm. Euphytica, 163, 143-158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9640-y

Schmitzer, V., Slatnar, A., Mikulic-Petkovsek, M., Veberic, R., Krska, B., & Stampar, F. (2011). Comparative study of primary and secondary metabolites in apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) cultivars. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 91(5), 860-866. https://doi.org//10.1002/jsfa.4257

Souty, M., & André, P. (1975). Composition biochimique et qualité des pêches. Annales de Thechnologie Agricole, 24(2), 217-236.

Vénien, S. (1998). Les unités de mesures de qualité. Info. Centre Technique Interprofessionnel des Fruits et Légumes (Ctifl), 141, 34-36.

Willer, H., & Lernoud, J. (Eds.) (2019). The world of organic agriculture. Statistics and emerging trends. Rheinbreitbach, Germany. https://www.organic-world.net/yearbook/yearbook-2019/pdf.ht.

Journal of Horticulture and Postharvest Research

Assessment of the organic fruit quality of local and introduced apricot cultivars grown in Tunisia: morphological and physico-chemical attributes

References

References

Volume 4, Issue 4 - Serial Number 15
December 2021
December 2021
Pages 399-412

Assessment of the organic fruit quality of local and introduced apricot cultivars grown in Tunisia: morphological and physico-chemical attributes

References

References

Volume 4, Issue 4 - Serial Number 15December 2021December 2021Pages 399-412

Volume 4, Issue 4 - Serial Number 15
December 2021
December 2021
Pages 399-412